Differences Between Batch Reactors And Continuous Reactors

83 Views

Among the major categories of industrial reactors, the most important are the batch and continuous reactors. Broadly speaking, most of the other reactors fall under either of these two categories. Both these varieties have their unique advantages. Which of these is appropriate for a plant/factory is dependent on exact requirements.

Batch reactors are enclosed vessels into which the entire reactants are introduced at the same time. The reaction then goes on until the desired output is seen. In a continuous reactor, as suggested by the name, the reactants are continuously introduced inside at a steady pace. As soon as the specified duration of the reaction is over, the products come out simultaneously.

Batch reactors are bigger when compared with the continuous flow variants. They are more widely available than continuous reactors, which are called flow reactors, too. Because of that, the cost of bringing in a batch reactor is much lower than that seen in the case of flow reactors. In particular, this facet of reduced cost becomes more significant for smaller businesses having budgetary constraints.

Batch reactors are useful when the products have to be made on a small scale, and where the reactions can be fairly complicated. On the other hand, continuous reactors are suitable for scenarios involving the manufacturing of bigger quantities of products. Here, the reactions are simple, and they don’t have to be closely monitored at all times.

Before sending reactants into a batch reactor, a lot of things have to be done manually, such as checking pressure, cleaning, and positioning. And when a typical continuous reactor is taken into account, automation takes care of all these key aspects.

The design of a batch reactor is such that it is highly effective in handling chemical reactions that progress at a slow pace. But it is not so when a continuous reactor is viewed. The use of these reactors is recommended only when the concerned processes progress at a faster pace.

In terms of handling reactions where the concentration levels of reactants are high, a flow reactor is superior. This is because when the reactant concentration level crosses the normal mark, excess heat can be generated. The continuous reactors are made in a way to exercise a check over the heat; the risk of adverse reactions declines.

Industries are using batch reactors for a very long time now. As a result, several patterns specific to their functioning have long been identified. Chemists and technical personnel working in plants/factories are knowledgeable about these patterns. They know what to anticipate at any given point in time when the processes are going on.

Even if any sudden issues crop up, they can be promptly resolved due to the availability of so much information. But, continuous reactors are comparatively of recent origin, and such extensive details about them are not yet available.
The productivity level of a batch reactor tends to be less, but its rate of conversion is the highest when compared with all kinds of reactors. Likewise, a flow reactor enables the making of an increased quantity of products. Here, the downside is that its conversion rate is lower.

The differences that have been described above clearly highlight the advantages and disadvantages of both kinds of reactors. A plant/factory should consider these pros and cons about its precise specifications. Subsequently, it can be decided which of the models is more appropriate for the facility in question.